MOTORWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND ITS IMPACTS ON CROPPING PATTERNS AND RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN PUNJAB, PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58475/2026.64.1.1271Keywords:
cropping pattern, farming households, infrastructure, livelihood strategies, PakistanAbstract
This study was conducted to assess the impact of motorway infrastructure projects on land use change and livelihood strategies of farming households in the rural areas of the Punjab, Pakistan. Study was conducted during 2023-24. There is a general agreement on the fact that one of the most important factors for the development of the region, is transport infrastructure, which creates new livelihood opportunities. However, land use change from agriculture to non- agricultural purpose known as land conversion can also be an outcome of road construction. land conversion has also disturbed the balance of environment and particularly agricultural biodiversity. In this context, the objective of the research was to assess the impact of motorway infrastructure projects on cropping pattern change and rural livelihoods in Punjab, Pakistan. For sampling purpose, a multistage method was applied to obtain a required information from 400 farming households. There are five motorways in Punjab Province, and out of these, three motorways were constructed during the last four years. Two newly constructed motorways were selected randomly. One tehsil from each region was selected purposely from where the motorways were being passed. From each tehsil, two union councils were selected purposely and after selection of union councils, three villages were selected, and from each village farming households were selected proportionately. The results obtained indicated after motorway construction, that 57.5% of respondents reported increase in their income through non-farming sources. ‘increased in the land value’ with the respondent’s opinion placed at ranked 1st and ‘Increased the no. of restaurants were ranked 6th position with mean value of 4.36 and 3.90 respectively. Similarly, more than half (55.5%) of respondent’s household’s assets were increased. Similarly, ‘agric. land decreased’ ‘intensive agric. Increased’ were ranked 4th and 5th with mean values of 3.06, 2.96 respectively. The results also indicate that, ‘Govt. policies affect cropping patterns’ with mean value of 3.83 were ranked at 1st position and moreover, ’Information from extension (private)’ were placed at ranked 2nd with mean value of 3.57. Market prices affect cropping patterns ranked at 3rd position with mean value of 3.32. Similarly, ‘Change in market demand’ were kept at ranked 4th with mean value of 3.24, and’ Information from extension services (public)’ were placed at ranked 5th with mean value of 3.20
Downloads
References
Adebayo, M. A. 2009. Impact of urban land use changes on property values in Metropolitan Lagos. The Social Sciences. 4 (1): 111-117.
Aldagheiri, M. 2009. The role of the transport road network in economic development of Saudi Arabia. (U. Brebbia C.A. Wessex Institute of Technology, Ed.) WIT transactions on the built Environment. (107):275-285.
Ali, L., M. Jianing, M. Shah, A. Khan and M. Imran. 2017. “Transport culture akin to China Pakistan economic corridor. Human System Mangement. 36(4): 381-396.
Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C., Irvine, C.K.S and D. Walker. 2018. introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
Ashok, KR. R. Balasubramanian. 2006. Role of infrastructure in productivity diversification of agriculture. and Research report. SANEI. Islamabad. Pakistan.
Best, R.K., L.B., Edelman, L.H. Krieger and S.R., Eliason. 2011. Multiple disadvantages: An empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Law & Society Review. 45(4): 991-1025.
Bhatia, M. S. 1999. Rural Infrastructure and Growth in Agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly. 34(13): 43-48. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4407793
Briassoulis, H. 2020. Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches. Carney, D. 2003. Sustainable livelihoods approaches: progress and possibilities for change (p. 64). London: Department for International Development.
Chambers, R. and G. Conway. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: concepts for the practical 21st century. Chandy, T. R., R. Keenan, R. Petheram and P. Shepherd. 2012. Impacts of Hydro power Development on Rural Livelihood Sustainability in Sikkim, India: Community Perceptions. Mountain Research and Development. 32(2):117-125.
Chivaura, V.G. and C.G. Mararike eds. 1998. The Human Factor Approach to Development in Africa, Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications.doi:10.2753/PET1061-1991560305
Feyisa, G.L., L. K. Palao, A. Nelson, M. K. Gumma, A. Paliwal, K. T. Win, K. H. Nge and D. E. Johnson. 2020. Characterizing and mapping cropping patterns in a complex agro-ecosystem: An iterative participatory mapping procedure using machine learning algorithms and MODIS vegetation indices. Comput. Electron. Agric. (175): 105595.
Findly, C. S. and J. Bourdages. 2000. Response time of wetland biodiversity to road construction on adjacent lands. Conservation Biology. 14: 86-94.
Ghaffar, A. 2006. Assessing urban sprawl in Lahore by using RS/ GIS techniques. Pak. Geog. Rev. 2:99-102. Goffman E. 2005. Highway and Environmental Impact Issues. Available at:http// www. csa.com/discoverguides/ern/05apr/ overview. php (Accessed: Jan 28, 2014).
GoP. 2009. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Economic Advisor’s Wing, Finance Division, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Guiteras, R. 2007. The impact of climate change on Indian agriculture. Department of economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Mimeo
Gumma, M.K. T. W.Tsusaka, I. Mohammed, G. Chavula, N. V. P. R. Ganga Rao, P. Okori, C. O. Ojiewo, R. Varshney, M. Siambi, A. Whitbread. 2019. Monitoring changes in the cultivation of pigeon pea and groundnut in Malawi using time series satellite imagery for sustainable food systems. Remote Sens. 11: 14-75.
Jones, P. and K. Lucas. 2012. The social consequences of transport decision making: Clarifying concepts, synthesizing knowledge and assessing implications. Journal Transport Geography. 21: 4–16.
Khan, L.I. 2014. Environmental Impacts Assessment of Faisalabad-Khanewal Motorway (M4). Thesis Submitted to The Lahore School of Economics. Khan, S. A. 2005. Introduction to extension education. Extension methods. 3-32.
Kothari, C. R. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Kuo, S. F. G.P. Merkley, C.-W. Liu. 2000. Decision support for irrigation project planning using a genetic algorithm, agric. water manage. (45): 243-266.
Lehovec, I. F. 2004. The effects of transportation infrastructure on development. Slovak journal of civil Engineering. 30-32.
Litman, T. 2011. Evaluating transportation land use impacts: Considering the impacts, benefits and costs of different land use development patterns. Canada Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
Liu, X. And J. Bae. 2018. Urbanization and industrialization impact of CO2 emissions in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 178-186.
Misra, S.K. and V. K. Puri. 2011. Indian Economy Its Development and Experience; Himalaya Publishing House Pvt. Ltd.
Mohsin, M. 2014. Urban growth and conversion of farmland in Bahawalpur City, Pakistan: Causes, Rates and Remedies. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saar brücken, Germany.
Mythili, G. 2006. “Supply response of Indian farmers: pre and post reforms”, working paper 2006-09, Indira Gandhi institute of development research, Mumbai,1-36.
National High Way Development Sector Investment Program. 2012. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan.
NHA, Pakistan. Olah, B. And MA. Boltižiar. 2009. Land use changes within the Slovak biosphere reserves zones. 28(2):127-51. PMDFC. 2002. Social Economic Impact Assessment of Rural Roads, Lahore, Pakistan. Resettlement Plan. NHA, Pakistan. Press. 1990.
Sangwan S. S. 2010. Occasional Paper – 53 Infrastructure for Agriculture Development National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai. Spector, P. E. 1981. Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of applied psychology. 72(3): 438.
Tan, R., V. Beckmann. L. Van den Berg, F. Qu. 2009. Governing farmland conversion: Comparing China with the Netherlands and Germany. Land Use Policy. 26(4): 961–974.
Van der Ree, R., J. A. Jaeger, E. A. van der Grift. And A. P. Clevenger. 2011. Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: road ecology is moving toward larger scales. Ecology and society. 16(1) https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03982-160148.
Vatanen, A. 2007. The Socio-Economic Benefits of Roads in Europe. International Road Federation (IRF) Research Council journal, November(ed).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asif Ali Agrarian, Babar Shahbaz (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
HEC Recognised Y- Category Journal